The EU environmental legislation shortfalls in implementation by Member States, according to an assessment from the Commission

The final assessment of the 6th Community Environment Action Programme (EAP) adopted by the Commission shows the accomplishments in the field of environment during the past ten years with examples as the extension of the Natura 2000 network or the introduction of a comprehensive chemicals policy. However this assessment also shows the need of progressing in implementing agreed EU objectives and rules.

According to the assessment adopted by the European Commission, the 6th Community Environment Action Programme (EAP) (2002-2012), has helped environment legislation to tackle almost all areas of the environment. Major accomplishments in the field of environment during the past ten years have been the extension of the Natura 2000 network to cover almost 18% of the EU's land area, the introduction of a comprehensive chemicals policy, and policy action on climate change. Nevertheless, there is progress needed in implementing agreed EU objectives and rules and in improving biodiversity protection, soil and water quality.

The seven thematic strategies identified in the 6th EAP – air, pesticides, waste prevention and recycling, natural resources, soil, marine environment and urban environment – have been developed in order to strengthen policy. The final evaluation of the 6th Environment Action Programme shows that the large majority of actions set out in the Programme have been or are in the process of being completed. Furthermore, the EAP served as a reference for Member States and local authorities in defending environment policy against competing policy demands, securing appropriate funding and providing predictability for business.

However, on this assessment there is no evidence that the 6th EAP was a dominant factor behind the adoption of environmental legislation during the last decade. Stakeholders felt however that the Programme's approval in 2002 by Council and European Parliament in co-decision gave it more legitimacy. Moreover, inadequate implementation and enforcement of EU environment legislation by Member States was also clearly identified as a limiting factor.

The assessment lays the basis for further dialogue between the Commission, Council, Parliament, civil society and business. The aim is to build consensus on the strategic orientations for environment policy, to ensure broad ownership and to secure mobilisation for action. Against this background, the Commission will consider how a new environment action programme could best provide added value in the rapidly evolving context for environment policy.